Case Studies

See how teams use Viewpoints to make better decisions, faster.

Iminski v. First Student · Oakland County, Michigan

A human jury found 8 to 0 for the plaintiff. Our simulated jurors matched

We gave a venue-matched simulated panel the same trial with the verdict withheld. It answered the court’s verdict form the way the jury did: yes on every liability question, the same wage figure to the dollar, and the defense’s valuation rejected 20 of 20.

Read the case study
Penny Plaintiff v. Bull’s Bar · the DRI head-to-head, Nashville

A human mock jury went 7 to 4 for the defense. Our simulated jurors agreed

The first public human vs. machine mock trial. A live mock jury heard a dram shop case at a DRI seminar, and a simulated panel was built on the same materials while the humans deliberated. Both found for the defendant, with the same leading themes, as published in DRI’s For The Defense.

Read the case study
Method resources
Need to choose a workflow before launch? Browse comparison guides.

Ready to see results like these?

Get research-grade feedback from any target audience in minutes.